One candidate’s deleted posts are now raising a bigger question: should Congress seat someone tied to open calls to abolish police, borders, and prisons?
Quick Take
- Archived reporting says Daraliza Avila Chevalier deleted thousands of old posts from her former Twitter account.
- Those posts allegedly pushed police abolition, border abolition, property seizure, and nationalization of major industries.
- She has said she regrets the language she used and would not use a lot of it today.
- Critics argue the posts should raise serious doubts about her judgment and fitness for office.
The Deleted Posts at the Center of the Fight
CNN’s KFile reported that Avila Chevalier’s former account included thousands of deleted posts from 2018 to 2022. The posts, as summarized in reporting, backed the abolition of police, prisons, and borders, along with calls to seize private property and nationalize major industries.[2] NBC-affiliated reporting also said archived posts showed a sweeping anti-capitalist view, including statements that no police, no prisons, and no borders were needed.[1]
That record matters because it goes beyond rough online talk. According to the reporting, the account also contained posts that questioned Israel’s right to exist and attacked Democrats in profane terms.[1][2][6] For voters who still believe basic law, border security, private property, and national sovereignty matter, the issue is not just tone. It is whether someone with those views should sit in the House after the campaign dust settles.
Avila Chevalier’s Defense and Public Regret
Avila Chevalier has not denied that the account belonged to her. In video interviews, she said she deleted the entire account years ago because she wanted to focus on school and organizing, not because she was running for office.[2] In a June 2026 NY1 debate clip, she also said she “deeply regrets” tweets from 2018 to 2022 and called her comments an effort to take accountability.[4]
She has also said she would not use much of that language today.[2] That admission may blunt some of the heat, but it does not erase the political record that critics are pointing to. The strongest defense is that people can mature. The strongest criticism is that the posts were not a one-off mistake. They reflected a long pattern of extreme rhetoric tied to core public issues.[1][2][6]
Why the Seating Fight Could Escalate
The bigger fight is not only about old tweets. It is about whether party leaders, election officials, or House members feel pressure to act when a candidate’s online record looks wildly outside mainstream American politics. Reporting in the New York Times says the deleted posts have overshadowed her race, while Yahoo News described her leaving a radio interview after being pressed on the same material.[3][4] That kind of reaction keeps the controversy alive.
There is also a plain political reality here. No public court filing, ethics complaint, or formal disqualification motion appears in the research package. That means critics have a strong media case, but not a formal legal one. For conservatives, the lesson is familiar: the left often talks about “accountability” until the same standard threatens one of its own. If a member-to-be wants the seat, voters deserve a full, honest answer.
The Real Test for Voters
Avila Chevalier’s supporters argue that she has changed, won a major upset, and brought energy to a hard-fought district race.[1][4][6] Her critics argue that deleted posts still reveal a worldview rooted in radical politics and hostility to police, borders, and American institutions.[1][2][6] Both claims are part of the record. What remains unresolved is whether that old record is just embarrassing history or a real warning sign about how she would govern.
Sources:
[1] Web – Daraliza Avila Chevalier’s Work With CUAD Could Be Grounds Not to Seat …
[2] Web – Tweet, Delete, Repeat: Social Media Posts Overshadow N.Y. House …
[3] Web – Mamdani-backed congressional candidate deleted posts calling to …
[4] Web – Vox on Instagram: “”I certainly wouldn’t use a lot of the language …
[6] Web – Darializa Avila Chevalier, a candidate in New York’s … – Facebook

NO MORE DEMOCRAT SOCIALISTS IN OUR COUNTRY. VERY SAD THAT OUR AMERICANS ARE FALLING HOOK LINE AND SINKER FOR COMMUNISM AND SOCIALISM. WE HAD OUR MILITARY IN WORLD WAR II TO FIGHT AGAINST THIS. IT WOULD BE A SLAP IN THE FACE TO EVERY FAMILY MEMBER HO LOST SONS AND DAUGHTERS , FIGHTING AGAINST COMMUNISM AND SOCIALISM, MAMDANI GOT ELECTED BY FOREIGNERS THING EVERYTHING WILL BE FREE, NOT BY HARD WORKING AMERICAN CITIZENS.
ARE WE REALLY LET MOSLIMS TAKE OVER OUR HOMELAND??? WITHOUT A FIGHT???