In a groundbreaking move, Bank Australia announced it will cease providing loans for new petrol and diesel cars starting from 2025. This decision, justified under the banner of climate change, marks a significant shift in the banking industry’s approach to environmental issues.
The bank’s Chief Impact Officer, Sasha Courville, stated this move is intended to send a clear message to the Australian market about the impending transition from internal combustion engines to electric vehicles.
The bank believes this transition will accelerate rapidly over the next few years.
Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore: Unelected globalists (including Klaus Schwab and the United Nations) are using the #ClimateScam as a pretext to ban fossil fuels and nitrogen fertiliser, in order to deliberately depopulate the planet.
"These powerful elites, like Schwab… pic.twitter.com/PbKh5sexmq
— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) August 29, 2023
However, this decision has sparked a debate about the role of banks in influencing consumer choices.
Critics argue by refusing to finance new fossil fuel vehicles, the bank is effectively dictating what type of cars its customers can purchase. Some even labeled this as ‘climate communism’ or ‘climate fascism’, suggesting that it represents an undue intrusion into personal freedoms.
Interestingly, while Bank Australia will no longer finance new fossil fuel cars, it will continue to provide loans for used fossil fuel cars.
This raises questions about the bank’s commitment to combating climate change. If the goal is to reduce carbon emissions, why continue to support the purchase of used cars that contribute to the problem?
Furthermore, critics argue this move could be financially motivated. Electric cars are generally more expensive than their petrol counterparts, primarily due to the cost of their large batteries.
By pushing customers towards electric vehicles, the bank could potentially increase the size of its loans and, consequently, its profits.
TRUTH.
1. God is real.
2. There are two genders.
3. Human flourishing requires fossil fuels.
4. Reverse racism is racism.
5. An open border is no border.
6. Parents determine the education of their children.
7. The nuclear family is the greatest form of governance known to… pic.twitter.com/rjTxRW7xkR— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) September 1, 2023
This decision also comes at a time when several countries, including Britain and the EU, have announced plans to ban the sale of new fossil fuel cars by 2030 and 2035 respectively.
These developments suggest we are on the brink of a major shift away from petrol and diesel cars. However, the question remains: Is this shift being driven by genuine concern for the environment, or is it simply another way for large corporations to exert control and increase their profits?
Finally, it’s worth noting electric vehicles are not without their drawbacks. They have shorter ranges and longer charging times than petrol cars, which can limit their users’ freedom of movement.
Moreover, the production of their batteries requires significant amounts of CO2, which undermines their environmental benefits.
Bank Australia’s decision ultimately raises important questions about the role of banks in shaping consumer behavior and the true motivations behind this shift towards electric vehicles.
